{"id":41,"date":"2026-04-13T03:40:27","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T03:40:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/?p=41"},"modified":"2026-04-13T04:02:21","modified_gmt":"2026-04-13T04:02:21","slug":"41","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/?p=41","title":{"rendered":"Oh, Video&#8230; are you true?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-2-683x1024.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-51\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-2-683x1024.png 683w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-2-200x300.png 200w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-2-768x1152.png 768w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-2.png 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/shorts\/jWCyDwNe8RA\">This is how insider trading REALLY works\u2026 or does it? \ud83d\udc40 #shorts #trading #donaldtrump<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left\"><strong><em>At first glance, it\u2019s a quick, punchy, and honestly pretty convincing video.<\/em><\/strong> The speaker\u2019s presence, the graphics, and the whole tone all work together exactly the way this kind of content is designed to spread. But that\u2019s also what made me stop and want to take a second look at it. It\u2019s not just the lack of context or sources, or how it feels more geared toward getting a reaction than actually informing me, the viewer. It\u2019s the whole package: the layout, the title, and that catchy but mysterious background tune pulling you in. That\u2019s why I decided to try and break this one down using a lateral reading approach. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left\">Turns out, it\u2019s a lot harder in practice than John from Crash Course Navigating Digital Information makes it appear, especially with these dang short-form videos. My two little brain cells almost caught fire\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Step 1: Stop \u2013 What is the claim, and what feels off?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The video presents a claim about that<strong> Donald Trump just move $580 million\u2026 with one post<\/strong>. Which is to say that Donald Trump knew this would happen and planned it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"595\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-52\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-3.png 975w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-3-300x183.png 300w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-3-768x469.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The red flags I noticed immediately:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>No other source cited in the video except the graph in the video that states <strong><em>Source: Bloomberg<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Strong and confident messaging tone with impacting and mysterious soundtrack without any additional sourcing or specific evidence<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A very short format video, no longer than 34 seconds, and purely focused on Donald Trump, the trade, and the mystery of it all\u2026<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Feels like it\u2019s simplifying something far more complex than just a suspicious trading deal just before the President speaks of a delay in bombing if Iranian energy infrastructure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"643\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-4.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-53\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-4.png 975w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-4-300x198.png 300w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-4-768x506.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size\"><strong>This is exactly the kind of short, attention-grabbing videos that have been discussed in the module. Fast, emotionally charged, and incredibly easy to share without really thinking it through.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Step 2: Investigate the Source<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Next, I researched the YouTube channel itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"695\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-5.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-5.png 975w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-5-300x214.png 300w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-5-768x547.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here are a couple of basic questions I wanted to answer:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Who runs this account?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Do they cite sources in other videos?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Are they informational, opinion-based, or entertainment?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here\u2019s what I found:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>From what I found from the YouTube and Instagram descriptions, Thinknomy presents itself as a channel focused on wealth, entrepreneurship, discipline, and a success-driven mindset by using storytelling (short clips from movies, news, or other related media). They pride themselves in creating insights from \u201cthinkers\u201d of the day in order to inspire growth and achievement at the individual level. Their messaging focuses on turning ideas into action through consistency and intentional effort. The channel has approximately 4.66K subscribers and 47 videos on YouTube with a total viewership of 4.3 million and has been active in the YouTube space since December 26<sup>th <\/sup>2025, yet the video in question has gained significant traction with 1.6 million views, 1,065 comments, and was posted on 28<sup>th<\/sup> March 2026. Thinknomy also maintains an Instagram presence; however, there is no clear information on who operates, funds, or determines its content, raising questions about transparency and credibility.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>No clear credentials or sourcing tied to the claim or the channel, for that matter.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"592\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-6.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-55\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-6.png 975w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-6-300x182.png 300w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-6-768x466.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size\"><strong>That doesn\u2019t automatically make it false, but it <em>does<\/em> mean I shouldn\u2019t trust it at face value.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Step 3: Lateral Reading \u2013 What do other sources say?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Instead of staying on YouTube, I opened some new tabs and conducted a search:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"border-width:15px\"><strong><em>Did Trump participate in or provide information that led to this big trade before he posted on Truth Social? Are we looking at a possible inside trading, or is this a coincidence?<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Reputable News Source #1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I checked coverage from BBC News<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br>\ud83d\udc49 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/cg547ljepvzo\">Oil traders bet millions ahead of Trump&#8217;s Iran talks post<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Findings:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Here\u2019s a kicker: in order to review this story from the BBC, there\u2019s a paywall. In fact, many of the \u201creputable news outlets\u201d require some form of subscription or login with your email to access their content. WSJ, The New York Times, BBC, Reuters, and many others all have the model. What really got me was that if I even wanted to verify the graph in the video, I would need to pay to access the Bloomberg website.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Provides me with nothing due to the paywall.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"663\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-7.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-56\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-7.png 975w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-7-300x204.png 300w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-7-768x522.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"584\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-8.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-57\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-8.png 975w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-8-300x180.png 300w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-8-768x460.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size\"><strong>You\u2019ve got to pay to read their \u201ctruth\u201d \u2014 and subscribe just to question it.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Reputable News Source #2<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I also looked at CBS News online<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br>\ud83d\udc49 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/insider-trading-oil-futures-trump-iran-post\/\">Oil trades surged just before Trump&#8217;s post on Iran talks. Some experts are suspicious. &#8211; CBS News<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Findings:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The CBS News article reports a real spike in oil trading right before Trump made his announcement on the pausing of bombing of Iran. The article goes on to note that financial experts found the timing of Trump&#8217;s Truth Social posting and the sudden spike in trading \u201csuspicious\u201d. However, it stopped short of offering proof of insider trading. It does attempt to offer potential explanations, including coincidence and algorithmic trading. In my comparison to the YouTube short, the content creator simplifies this event into a 34-second video that may imply wrongdoing. While the CBS article does confirm this type of large trading is unusual, and its timing is strange, it does try to add context that the video doesn&#8217;t even attempt to engage. Overall, the reporting does not support the video\u2019s tone and implied conclusion and highlights how missing context can turn a questionable event into a misleading narrative or worse, take a truth and distort it.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It does, however, confirm that a significant and interesting trade regarding securities and crude oil did occur within minutes of Trump&#8217;s posting on the 23<sup>rd<\/sup> of March 2026; it does not contradict the video in that sense, but the article doesn\u2019t imply Trump is the master mind behind the trades as the video&#8217;s title would suggest.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size\"><strong>This source suggests the issue is potentially more complex than the video suggests.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Step 4: Fact-Checking Source<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\ud83d\udc49 Snopes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.snopes.com\">https:\/\/www.snopes.com<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rumorguard.org\/\">RumorGuard from the News Literacy Project<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Findings:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>I couldn\u2019t find anything on either of these sites.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>However, when I looked at different news <strong>outlets (those I could access without paying or giving up my email)<\/strong> that covered the $580M oil trades before Donald Trump\u2019s post, they were consistent with the facts surrounding the matter and mostly the same details, but the ole spin on Trump didn\u2019t stay the same. Outlets like CBS News and Fortune kept thing cautious, using words like \u201csuspicious\u201d without going hard in the paint. Meanwhile, others like The Daily Beast or Media Matters for America climbed over each other and did more than just hint at insider trading. Even the more extreme outlets accused Trump directly.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p style=\"border-width:16px\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?sca_esv=6632e39a9fd71d54&amp;sxsrf=ANbL-n5EawZXwxhqndxPXcLlPjsn2qCVeA:1776043606223&amp;q=is+this+true%3F+Donald+Trump+just+move+%24580+million%E2%80%A6+with+one+post&amp;tbm=nws&amp;source=lnms&amp;fbs=ADc_l-aN0CWEZBOHjofHoaMMDiKp0UJuhqwKhR0QUhF54-6jIYFfWbU_Clyew-1Wh7zkL7EUcewkj-Y5mEXWvVf2-8S7Q9JzmuMHBTnAM1FBTEpBAA6ghZXslcE6dJxwMWTLgGoAr4vYGCqFp1bqwX9pdu1VtM8TVsK2QpWIASBYKEiS5XGwgKc6E7Dp3ilRZxQId1C2H3zqV-Yekj5Y5u09hyXTQo1fKw&amp;sa=X&amp;ved=2ahUKEwj9qISC1umTAxVEl-4BHRBCKQEQ0pQJegQIFxAB&amp;biw=1528&amp;bih=732&amp;dpr=2.5\">is this true? Donald Trump just move $580 million\u2026 with one post &#8211; Google Search<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>\u201cDid Donald Trump really move $580 million with one post?\u201d<\/em> That\u2019s what I tossed into the good ole trusty Google search machine, and the algorithm bequeathed me the following\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That after digging through a handful of \u201ccredible\u201d sources, Google was kinda all over the place, offering most news sources leaning liberal, a couple hovering in the center, and one in the top ten you could consider conservative; however, all telling the same story with slightly different spins depending on their audience. Same facts, different flavor. Even AI tends to lean a little left of center, so yeah\u2026 I\u2019m not exactly taking anything at face value here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Step 5: Check Context<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This part matters more than people truly understand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I looked at:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Date<\/strong> \u2013 Is this old information being reused?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Location<\/strong> \u2013 Is this specific to one place?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Missing details<\/strong> \u2013 What\u2019s not being said?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this case:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>So it\u2019s not an old posting, and the event it&#8217;s showing is likely still developing. It focuses on the suspicious nature and timing of Donald Trump\u2019s posting and the time the trades where exicuted. What stood out to me is what\u2019s missing in the video: there\u2019s no proof of who made the trades, no confirmation of insider knowledge, and no expert sources. It leans heavily on suspicious timing without real evidence. Overall, it grabs attention but feels incomplete and leaves out key details needed to fully understand the situation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-small-font-size\"><strong>This is where a lot of misinformation lives\u2014not in completely false claims, but in missing context<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>My Humble Assessment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After walking through all of this, my conclusion is that the claim in the video is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\ud83d\udc49 <strong>Misleading but partially true.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here\u2019s why:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>It lacks detailed sourcing and context<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It oversimplifies a more complex issue and time<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Other credible sources neither specifically contradict. But do offer important context<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>There is no specific data to support the claim<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-center has-x-large-font-size\"><strong>Why This Matters<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This whole process took me about two and a half hours (way too many rabbit holes\u2026 I almost fell into one and never got out\u2026 lol), and honestly, it all but confirmed something I had already suspected: that most short videos are built to hit your emotions, not actually inform you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Trying to use lateral reading here was a bit of a dead end for me. The content creator didn\u2019t provide any sources, just vague claims and a \u201cIs this genius\u2026 or manipulation? Googly eyes and comment your opinion,\u201d which is fine if you treat it like entertainment or a thought exercise and just move on after.&nbsp; But as you\u2019ll see if you spend just a few moments in the comments, you\u2019ll quickly notice this video only validated and supported the viewers\u2019 perspective and treated it as evidence of corruption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"975\" height=\"632\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-9.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-58\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-9.png 975w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-9-300x194.png 300w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-9-768x498.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 975px) 100vw, 975px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One solid takeaway or perspective I would recommend that everyone consider: every outlet has some level of bias; political, religious, and ideological. That doesn\u2019t make them liars or untrustworthy directly, but it does mean their content is or likely will be influenced. Bottom line: don\u2019t look for just the perfect\u2026 or\u2026 your\u2026 truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"683\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-10-683x1024.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-59\" srcset=\"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-10-683x1024.png 683w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-10-200x300.png 200w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-10-768x1152.png 768w, https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/image-10.png 900w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 683px) 100vw, 683px\" \/><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is how insider trading REALLY works\u2026 or does it? \ud83d\udc40 #shorts #trading #donaldtrump At first glance, it\u2019s a quick, punchy, and honestly pretty convincing video. The speaker\u2019s presence, the graphics, and the whole tone all work together exactly the way this kind of content is designed to spread. But that\u2019s also what made me [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=41"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":66,"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41\/revisions\/66"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=41"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=41"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/franktheseabee.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=41"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}